Translate

Showing posts with label Tennessee Auto industry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tennessee Auto industry. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

EDTA Conference Attendees How's Day #2 ..... I'm Going Through Technical Documents - Seems Like the Access Justice People at the Tennessee Bar Association Do NOT Recognized Marginalized NeoCons....It's Just NOT Fair. I'm a Human Being Too.. Hedy Weinberg of the ACLU Shame on YOU!!!




this is on record at the court of appeals...  I have to get all the information in hope that one of the lawyers I reached out to will helped me with my brief...  I don't know what else to do.  I have proof the ADA Terry Wood lied.  I have proof NISSAN paid a lawyer Joe Baugh to "act" as the victims lawyer... Joe Baugh assisted the DA and gave him documents needed to get me indited.  
Terry Wood says he "acted on his own"... WHY would a young ADA take a email "stalking" case to a Grand Jury - one against a woman with a clean record  who just had a "similar" email harassment charged DROPPED.  In tennessee you can NOT stalk a corporation ... It says in the statue it MUST be an individual..  NISSAN had NO RIGHT to have a lawyer assist Terry Wood.  I will take it to the Supreme Court (or try)  what happened to me was a VIOLATION of my American rights... 



  1. girlintheblackhonda.com/Renault_Spy_Strauss_Kahn.html

  2. Senator Dianne Feinstein Remember Me?: James Clapper, Stephen ...

    senatordiannefeinstein.blogspot.com/2012/12/blog-post.html







Saturday, October 13, 2012

Erich Marx Even Paranoids Can Be Followed.... Or in This Case Be Treated Like a Caged Animal....


I'm on HIGH Alert....  When something seems "odd" i'm texting plate #'s to friends.... Y'all in Tennessee have NOT succeeded in making me "crazy" you've succeeded in my finding the "inner" strength to FIGHT BACK.   These two men that were "in the middle" of having a drink quicly fled after I put my stuff next to them at Starbucks.  It's NOT uncommon.  Erich Marx wife once came in saw me.... her eyes popped like a deer in the headlights... then she left without buying any coffee and then made cell phone calls.  It was CREEPY.I'm tired of being treated like a GARGOYLE... I'm a human being and no longer to I want to feel like a Beta Fish in a little bowl.  I told a friend today that I want to live in Virgina because there I'm just a person... All this "drama" is nothing to the  people that live in DC.  There I can have a "normal life".... I need NISSAN to mediate and to give me my reputation back...  Many months ago I was sent Lanny Davis's email address.  I was told he's the type of man that can get you through this juggernaut.  I'll be contacting that office Monday. To my blog viewers that know him... Please tell him to do it....

Thank you.  Have a Great Weekend!!
Sharyn Bovat
615-415-6675

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Carlos Tavares KNEW That I Asked Ed Gillespies Office to Help with Dept. of Energy Fraud





Have a Great Day!!!


Sharyn









  • America is About Freedom and NOBODY should have to date a man (even Al Gore) simply to avoid being bullied in the judicial system.  Now that Mr. Gore's "bizarreness" & illogical thinking has been caught on camera people understand that YES what happened to me in Tennessee is real.  Also I have "web stats"...

  • http://voice-of-a-moderate.blogspot.com/2012/10/al-gore-altitude-in-nashville-is-normal.html


    Friday, September 21, 2012

    Cocktails With Sharyn Honors Portugal & Carlos Tavares the Renault COO

    =

    Nissan Whistleblower Inspired by Ed Gillespie, Rudy Giuliani - PRWeb

    www.prweb.com/releases/2011/04/prweb5257644.htm
    Apr 18, 2011 – Sharyn Bovat of Franklin Tennessee has faced months of court ... says she's inspired by Rudy Giuliani, Ed Gillespie and Carlos Tavares in her ...

    Here's an exerpt from that Press Release... Had people in Tennessee known of the problems MAYBE the bullying of a whistleblower would not have happened?

    Sharyn is inspired to continue with her blogs due to Carlos Tavares the Chairman of the Americas for NISSAN. Mr. Tavares listened to Bovat when nobody else would at NISSAN North America. Nissan’s own internal statistics show that women in management decreased from 20.9% to 10% after the North American HQ moved to Tennessee from California. According to http://www.coolsprings.com Sharyn Bovat believes her arrests were retaliation from whistle blowing against a “Good Ole Boy” network that dominates the south. Carlos Tavares gave Sharyn “the Freedom” to fight for what she believed to be morally right and attempt to change the corporate culture at NISSAN North America in a very “out of the box” way. On her blog http://www.sharynbovat.com Bovat has is documented that she communicated with Nissan IT management “after” her viral protest began and that she had emails from Mr. Tavares

    Friday, August 24, 2012

    NISSAN Loan NOT Investigated Properly by Herb Allison: It was NEVER Mentioned that Obama Bundler Did Review & Might NOT Have Mentioned the Treasure Bank Used: NISSAN Does Business with IRAN. It's NOT Legal to Fund Companies that Deal with Terrorist.... Is it?

    NISSAN in Default on Whistleblowers Lawsuit: Basically Admitting They Had the Whistleblower Maliciously Prosecuted
    Leaf EV is Proving to be a Failure: Promised Job creation is NOT happening.

    From the lawsuit:  The Plaintiff is a whistleblower for various assertions regarding Nissan, its hiring practices, and its use of federal money for the development of the Nissan Leaf which is a technological and financial failure. 


    *** Women in management at NISSAN "really" went from 20.9% in 2006 to 10% in 2009.


    Obama Bundler NOT Mentioned on Report?


      1. Watchdog who signed off on Obama energy loans also an an Obama donor
        Deseret News‎ - 5 hours ago
        In this June 24, 2009, file photo, Herb Allison testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Allison, a veteran businessman and Washington hand ...


       Copy of Malicious Prosecution lawsuit filed on 
      July 19th in the State of Tennessee

      In the circuit court for Williamson county, Tennessee
      At Franklin
      Sharyn Bovat,  Plaintiff
      Vs.
                       Nissan North America, Inc. Defendant. 
      COMPLAINT
      Comes the Plaintiff, Sharyn Bovat (“Bovat”), by and through counsel, and sues the Defendant, Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”), and for cause would state and show as follows: 
      I
      The parties
      1. The Plaintiff, Sharyn Bovat, is a citizen and resident of Williamson County, Tennessee and was such for all times material hereto. The Plaintiff is a whistleblower for various assertions regarding Nissan, its hiring practices, and its use of federal money for the development of the Nissan Leaf which is a technological and financial failure. 
      2. The Defendant, Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”) is located in Williamson County, TN. Its registered agent is LexisNexis Document Solutions, Inc., 2908 Poston Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203-1312.
      II
      venue and jurisdiction
      1. The Plaintiff avers that venue is proper in this Court because all acts complained of occurred and accrued in Williamson County, TN.
      2. The Plaintiff avers that jurisdiction is proper in this Court because it has in personam and subject matter jurisdiction over the parties and this type of dispute.
      III
      the facts
      1. The Plaintiff avers that the Defendant had her charged with stalking on the 11th of October, 2010 and she was arrested on charges of criminal trespass and stalking in indictment # I-CR105253. 
      2. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, did not have probable cause to bring charges against her for stalking particularly since a corporation cannot be the victim of stalking pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315.  
      3. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, misused and abused the court system in an attempt to silence the Plaintiff because of her internet postings which revealed compromising information about Defendant, Nissan, and its use of government money to finance the Nissan Leaf which is an abyssmal failure.
      4. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, brought the false charge against her in order to silence her and it did so with malice.
      5. The Plaintiff avers that this case was tried before a jury on February 1,  2012. The Plaintiff further avers that the stalking charge against her was dismissed upon her motion to dismiss at the close of the state’s proof because a corporation cannot be a victim of a stalking charge brought pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
      6. The Plaintiff avers that she was arrested for violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1) on several occasions and forfeited her freedom as part of the unlawful scheme and covin instituted by Defendant, Nissan, and Carlos Tavares and Carlos Ghosn, to silence the Plaintiff. 
      7. The Plaintiff avers that the charge remained pending against her for almost two years while she awaited trial and that this caused her great stress and anxiety.
      8. The Plaintiff avers that she has suffered extreme stress, humiliation, embarrassment and anxiety as a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s actions.
      9. The Plaintiff published a blog at www.GirlintheBlackHonda.com  which was critical of Defendant, Nissan’s, use of federal tax dollars for the development and manufacture of the electric vehicle Nissan calls the Leaf, which is an acronym for “Leading Environmentally Friendly, Affordable, Family” car. The Plaintiff has been critical of the waste of the federal tax dollars particularly with the short distance the Leaf can actually go on a single battery charge. 
      10. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, was motivated to silence her due to her critical internet postings and that it used the criminal justice system in order to do so. 
      IV
      first Cause of action
      malicious prosecution
      1. The Plaintiff relies upon the factual averments in numbered paragraphs 1-14 in support of the following cause of action.
      2. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, has committed the tort of malicious prosecution by having her charged and arrested for stalking when she could not lawfully be charged with violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
      3. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, did not have the legal authority or probable cause to charge her with violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
      4. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, and with the aid and assistance of the Williamson County District Attorney, maliciously charged her with stalking in order to silence her. 
      5. The Plaintiff avers that on February 1, 2012 the charge against her for violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1) was dismissed at trial at the close of the state’s proof by Judge Walter Kurtz who agreed with her position and argument that a corporation cannot be a victim of stalking pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1). This constitutes a termination of the unlawful stalking charge in her favor.
      6. The Plaintiff avers that the stalking charge was brought against her for unlawful purposes in order to silence her and Defendant, Nissan, used its political weight in Williamson County to compel the Williamson County District Attorney’s Office to prosecute the Plaintiff and incarcerate her using a statute, namely Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1), which could not be lawfully used. The Plaintiff was jailed, had to post a bond, make numerous court appearances and hire a defense attorney to defend her. 
      7. The Plaintiff avers that the Williamson County District Attorney knew that the Plaintiff could not be legally charged with violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1) at all times yet they proceeded with initially charging her using a warrant and then by convening and presenting the charge to the Williamson County Grand Jury in secret. 
      8. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, also hired a private prosecutor who attempted to prosecute the charge against her. The Defendant, Nissan, hired the former Williamson County District Attorney, Mr. Joseph D. Baugh, to prosecute the charge against her. Mr. Baugh is a well-respected, capable attorney, with years of experience prosecuting criminal offenses. 
      9. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, had the aid and counsel of the taxpayers’ funded District Attorney General’s Office and the former District Attorney General himself, Mr. Joseph D. Baugh, to advise it, consult with, and prosecute the Plaintiff on the illegal charge of violating Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-315(b)(1).
      10. The Plaintiff avers that she has sustained significant financial and physical injuries as a result of being charged illegally with a crime that she could not actually commit, by being incarcerated illegally, by having to pay bail money, and having to hire attorneys, as well as the pain, humiliation, stress and anxiety caused by facing up to eleven months and twenty-nine days in jail. The Plaintiff avers that the Defendant’s actions were intentional, malicious and they warrant punitive damages. 
      V
      second Cause of action
      abuse of process
      1. The Plaintiff relies upon the factual averments in numbered paragraphs 1-24 in support of the following cause of action.
      2. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, used the process of the Court in arresting the Plaintiff and charging her for an improper purpose and with an improper motive.
      3. The Plaintiff avers that Defendant, Nissan, used the warrant and capias process to further its objective of silencing the Plaintiff. 
      4. The Plaintiff avers that she has sustained damages as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant’s actions as previously pled. 
      THE PLAINTIFF PRAYS FOR THE FOLLOWING RELIEF: 
      1. That the Defendant be served with process and be required to answer within the time allowed by law;
      2. That the Plaintiff be awarded compensatory damages in an amount in excess of $250,000;
      3. That the Plaintiff be awarded punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the jury;
      4. That a jury of six (6) be impaneled to hear this action;
      5. That she be awarded such other, further relief to which she may be entitled.
      Respectfully submitted,
      __________________                                                                                         
      G. Kline Preston, IV
      TBPR #17141
      Kline Preston Law Group, P.C.
      Belle Meade Office Park
      4515 Harding Pike, Suite 107
      Nashville, TN 37205
      Tel: (615) 279-1619



      Monday, August 20, 2012

      NISSAN Leaf Owners are Telling Sharyn Bovat that NISSAN DID Lie About The Battery.... It's TIme To Apologize to Sharyn







      Below is from an article on the web these are quots from ACTUAL Leaf owners.... I too wanted the EV to succeed and I emailed THAT to Carlos Tavares.  in February 2010 he emailed ME directly.  HE KNEW THE LEAF BATTERY WAS FRAUD.... He's been trying to solve the problems.  Sadly....  NASA has worked on a better battery for years and NISSAN's "hail Mary pass" is a FUMBLE...
      NISSAN it's time to MEDIATE with the WHistleblower and "confess" to the fraud... The Class Action lawsuit by the Leaf owners is gonna DESTRY you....  I told you so.....
      ....Officially Nissan’s jury is still out. We contacted the company and spokesperson Katherine Zachary said today she could share very little, although she did say a total of seven cars were tested.
      The MyNissanLeaf forum members – sifting the tealeaves – have heard from at least six owners who had their cars thoroughly tested, and rumor had it this could be as many as 11 Leafs tested. Today Nissan specified the count, but that’s all it has to say.
      “We are studying the results of the seven cars tested and will let you know when we have something to share,” Zachary said.
      Another aspect of this mystery already known is Nissan covered itself by not offering a Leaf battery warranty that would address issues like those now being experienced when it launched the car. The Chevy Volt battery is by contrast warranted, as is the similar battery in Nissan alliance partner, Renault.
      It’s been observed the Volt’s battery affects emissions controls, as a degraded battery would make the engine run more often, but a Leaf with a degraded battery still emits nothing. Beyond this, Nissan has taken the warranty posture it has, which contrasts to General Motors which already suffered through the EV1 debacle, and in any case has learned some public relations lessons.
      The Volt’s battery – as is true for Tesla’s – is furthermore more thoroughly engineered with a liquid cooling/heating Thermal Management System.
      In February this year, Nissan said in an article touting its EV prowess that a liquid heating/cooling thermal management system was not necessary for the U.S. climates.
      In 2010 Wired ran a report suggesting the battery was under-engineered, and that was turned into an Autoblog post which has since proven potentially prophetic.
      As patience is now being urged by Leaf owners, comments on the owners’ forum run the gamut, and all options are being explored.
      One occupational hazard Nissan essentially took in creating an advanced battery electric vehicle is it attracted some forward-thinking people as its first customers. Many of these folks tend to be well educated, informed, proactive, assertive, and they are watching Nissan for potential improprieties, some of which have already been noted.
      [Forum member] Tony has been one of the strongest supporters of the LEAF and it is troubling to see the transformation in recent months. I should say that this is troubling for Nissan and it's fledgling EV enterprise because clearly, unlike GM (maybe it's really learned from the EV1 fallout), Nissan has not shown appropriate support for it's early adopters!
      First, somebody must ask themselves what their end game is. For me, I want to see EVs succeed, and soon. Nissan could quite conceivably put a really big dent in that movement, or just make it a speed bump. This issue really is that pivotal, in my opinion.
      Said another regarding possibly taking Nissan to court:
      This idea of not pressuring or punishing Nissan "for the good of the EV movement" is ridiculous. You do not help a person or a cause by coddling their weaknesses. … Is it lawsuit time? Of course not yet. But one should not be afraid of that remedy and we should not be critical of anyone who goes that route. The complaint is legitimate and some kind of restitution is most definitely in order. Hopefully Nissan will recognize this and do the right thing.
      The worrisome aspect at this juncture is that the reported degradations are SO much worse than Nissan predicted, it makes one wonder just how bad it might get -- even in more temperate locales. And at this point I'm not inclined to give Nissan the benefit of the doubt in regards to degradation "flattening out."
      Unfortunately Nissan is quickly losing the ambassadorship of the enthusiastic early-adopters.
      I think they really need to step out in front of this in a big way, even if they don't yet have all the answers. And not a memo full of disclaimers and spin, but forthright statements and a major unwavering show of commitment, such as a retro-active warranty.
      The clock is ticking.

      Monday, August 13, 2012

      Tennessee ECD DId a Big PR Blow Job for NISSAN....After They Paid NISSAN a LOT of Taxpayer Cash.... I Don't Get it? Maybe Lamar Alexander's Son Could Explain?

      Seeing Silverman tomorrow can't wait to show him how retarded the ECD staff is.  


      Ooops I'm sorry ... intellectually challenged.

      Silverman liked me for my BRAIN he said I was the ONLY one he knew of in TENNESSEE.

      I think he might be right.....


      OMG!!!! 
      The State of Tennessee ECD released the video a couple days ago and the man quoted is the French guy Dominique Thormann from NISSAN is the man who in 2009 was sent back to Paris for being a BAD SPENDER of Taxpayer money.

      They show the pro-to type EV.... and the car that ONLY sold 395 units last month and one that 1.4 BILLION tax dollars were used to build a car with OUTDATED technology. the average cost per job created is about 10 Million each..  That does NOT include the taxpayer money used for ME to find a spa for Oxygen Facials for the CEO's former Mistress.  It's INSANE!!!!


      '
      http://youtu.be/1UICoDJ-DSU