Saturday, May 21, 2016

James Clapper, James Comey FBI, John Brennan.... Looks Like I Was Right About the Lockerbie Bombing ... I Got Abused For Whistleblowing & Terrorized By NISSAN Execs Protecting the CIA (Long Story) It Looks Like their bullying the Ex UK Justic Minister .... Now he knows How iFeel - He Said NOTHING Wrong... Unless the TRUTH is Wrong?

Gannett wouldn't publish it BUT I have the balls.....  I also have been blogging it was the Palestinian Group a LONG time and the DIA declassified docs many years ago..... This book has no new info. What the UK establishment is doing is just like the political establishment in America is doing ... they are "hiding history".... it's just sad & scary.
Below is an excerpt from the controversial & I hear could be embargoed book of ex UK Justice Minister Kenny MacAskill the excerpt was sent to me from a Scottish man that I admire & am inspired by.  
Who was really behind the Lockerbie bombing?

In this extract from his new book, the former Holyrood justice secretary Kenny MacAskill outlines how a coalition of the willing resulted in the destruction of Pan Am flight 103

It was accepted Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi hadn’t acted alone. He didn’t do it for his own cause or personal benefit. He was a relatively senior Libyan agent but still junior in rank to Abdullah Senussi, head of Libyan intelligence and brother-in-law of Colonel Muammar Gadaffi; senior minister Moussa Koussa; and ultimately Gadaffi. If he had acted, it would have been on their authority and under their direction. This was state-sponsored terrorism. It’s not just the evidence before the court that implicated Libya. Gadaffi himself accepted culpability by the Libyan regime. That wasn’t just the signing of the UN treaty or the payment of compensation to victims. In an interview with the Washington Times in July 2003, he accepted his country’s guilt for the downing of Pan Am flight 103.

He explained it had originally been an Iranian retaliatory terrorist attack for the downing by the US Navy of a peaceful Iran Air Airbus on its daily run across the Strait of Hormuz, stating: “Nobody in our part of the world believed the US government when it said it was an accidental occurrence. So the Iranians subcontracted part of the job to a Syrian intelligence service, which in turn asked the Libyan Mukhabarat to handle part of the assignment. That is the way these things were planned in those days.”

Nor was it just the Gadaffi regime that accepted Libyan responsibility for it. Following the fall of the regime, the National Transitional Council (NTC) stated publicly that Gadaffi had personally ordered it. In February 2011, Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, who had been justice minister under Gadaffi, had defected and been appointed head of the NTC. He told a Swedish newspaper “Gadaffi gave the order about Lockerbie”, and said that he had proof that Gadaffi had personally ordered Megrahi to commit the crime. Discussions since, between law enforcement and the new Libyan authorities and prosecutors, have confirmed that involvement. It fitted the actions of the regime over the 40 years of Gadaffi’s rule. Murder and terror were part of his regime’s very DNA.

Lockerbie was just one of many terrorist actions that the Libyan regime under Gadaffi carried out. But Gadaffi was not alone. He had his acolytes and aides. While Gadaffi might sign it off, others would do the dirty work. One of the principal players was Abdullah Senussi. He was not only head of internal intelligence but close to Gadaffi. He was pivotal. Indeed, he was convicted in absentia of involvement in the bombing of the UTA airliner in Niger the year after Lockerbie. He was a man with few compunctions and little mercy. He had authorised the brutal slaying of 1,200 prisoners at Abu Selim prison in 1996. Others over many years were to suffer because of him, as his ruthless prosecution of dissidents showed. He was a friend of Megrahi’s and no actions by Megrahi would have been without his orders or consent.

Others, too, would have had to have been in the know and given instructions or provided assistance. Koussa was also a very close confidante of the Libyan leader. He later became head of external security in 1994 until 2009 when he became foreign minister. At the time of the Lockerbie bombing, he headed up an organisation known as the World Centre to promote the Libyan regime’s views but which was viewed in the West as the source of training and funding for revolutionary groups. However, though Libya was pivotal, it was not alone. As a former senior police officer once said to me, it was a coalition of the willing. So what happened?

The atmosphere between the West and Middle Eastern states including Iran, Libya and client organisations was poisonous by the summer of 1998. When in July of that year the USS Vincennes brought down an Iranian plane flying across the Strait of Hormuz, killing all aboard, it grew significantly more venomous. The United States neither sought to atone nor apologise for it. That caused anger and outrage not just in Iran but in the wider Muslim and Arab world. The bitterness and hostility was longstanding and the belief of an eye for an eye existed on all sides. It resulted in Iran putting up a bounty of $10m to bring down an American airliner as revenge. That was confirmed by security and Pentagon sources as well as in the Middle East. Iran put up the money, but who would do it? Enter the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — General Command (PFLP-GC). They had the capacity and the will to do it, as past atrocities confirmed. Their leader Ahmed Jibril has been identified by several sources as pivotal to the atrocity. The PFLP-GC would be assisted by others. That too was normal. Hence, Gadaffi’s mention of the Syrian security services’ initial involvement. Carrying out such actions involved many states and organisations working together and sharing skills and expertise. The Libyans were used to co-operating with other groups either to promote or support terrorism. The PFLP-GC was to carry it out, supported in the shadows by both the Syrian and Libyan security services.

They set to work on their planning to perpetrate it, acquiring flight timetables and even Pan Am luggage labels for the aircraft. Radio cassettes and timers were acquired for the bomb. The western intelligence services knew that something was brewing and were on their guard and on high alert. A plane was being targeted and terrorists intent on carrying it out were on the loose.

There was considerable fear and alarm. In October of that year, good work by the German police saw a significant PFLP-GC cell detained and broken near Frankfurt in Germany. But that success did not stop the alarm bells ringing. They’d stopped one cell, but there would be others out there, willing and eager to carry on where the others had failed. The PFLP-GC, though, was badly incapacitated and looked for help. That call was answered by the Libyans, who already knew of the plans. They were already involved in the supply of timers and other support. The Libyans picked it up from there. They had experience in bombings in the past and working with the PFLP-GC. They’d already have been sighted on the plan. It was now reaching a new and deadly stage. Malta was to be the setting for it.

Clothes in the suitcase that carried the bomb were acquired in Malta, though not by Megrahi. But if Megrahi didn’t buy the clothes, he was certainly involved. He had held a senior post in the Libyan security service (JSO) as head of airline security, which mirrored his job with Libyan Arab Airlines (LAA) with a similar title. Even when he left the airline job he retained the accreditation and no doubt the security service post. He had close links and personal friendships with senior officers and also with Abdullah Senussi, who was head of operations at that time for the JSO. A member he undoubtedly was and, given his important job, a relatively senior one. He had after all been identified by Edwin Bollier, owner of the timer manufacturer MEBO, as being at test explosions of the timers in Libya. He had also been involved in the purchase of radio receivers for the military from MEBO the year before and been involved in the procurement of an antenna for the head of the JSO. That had taken place after he’d left his role with the airline in January 1987 and when Megrahi himself suggested his links with the JSO had ceased. Yet the evidence shows that the antennas were ordered in November 1987 and it was Megrahi who conducted the transaction with MEBO for the security service. He was the conduit for much of the trade between MEBO and the JSO, showing a level of trust and involvement that would not be afforded a simple middleman. He was still an agent and he would obey orders when instructed, whatever they were.

And so it was to be. Megrahi flew in to Malta with the suitcase that was to transport the bomb. He travelled on a false passport that he only used once that year; and which he’d never use again. He had used it in 1987 for a trip to Nigeria where on one leg of the trip he had been on the same plane as another senior JSO official, Nassr Ashur, who had also been present at the testing of air detonation bombs. Though the use of such passports was not uncommon in Libya to avoid sanctions, their use was restricted. Moreover, he was unable to give any explanation for his journey. While a court of law does not oblige an accused to testify, the court of public opinion most certainly does. Even in his own biography professing his innocence he simply says he can’t recall why he went. It seems entirely incredible that anyone would fly to a foreign country for one night only, using a false passport and have no idea or recollection why they had done so. Finally, and no doubt the reason he chose not to give evidence, he had lied in previous public comments on his actions. In an interview with the TV reporter Pierre Salinger in November 1991, he had denied being involved with Libyan intelligence, which he clearly was; refuted suggestions that he knew or was involved in the acquisition of timers, which he had been; and in particular denied being in Malta on December 20 and 21 under a false passport, during which time he had been staying at the Holiday Inn Hotel, which he did.

All quite damning. But there was more. The suitcase was a Samsonite model, sold heavily in the Middle East market. Megrahi had been to Malta the month before, which was probably preparatory for the scheme and involved discussions on the logistics of clothes, the suitcase and the bomb equipment. He may even have brought the timers in with him. He would meet with others in the embassy to discuss and build on plans already developed by the PFLP-GC — hence the interlining with a flight through Frankfurt in Germany.

Though Megrahi had been involved in the acquisition of timers, and even witnessed their use in tests in Libya, he would not be the bomb maker. That would have been prepared in the Libyan People’s Bureau as appears to have occurred in other terrorist incidents, such as the La Belle bombing in Berlin in 1986. Megrahi had arrived at Malta’s Luqa Airport on December 20 at about 5.30pm, accompanied by Lamin Fhimah, a JSO agent who had been the LAA manager for Malta based at the airport. Fhimah had only gone back to Tripoli from Malta on December 18 to be briefed; and, as the Crown suggested at the trial, to assist Megrahi back through security at the airport. Fhimah’s familiarity with the airport as well as contacts would be crucial.

Having deposited the case that night at the bureau, Megrahi would get it back loaded with both the clothes and the bomb secreted in a Toshiba radio cassette player. Supergrass Abdul Majid, who had been the assistant manager for LAA at Luqa airport at the time assisting Fhimah and himself a Libyan agent, stated that he’d seen both Megrahi and Fhimah arrive at the airport from a Tripoli flight, accompanied by two others, one of whom was another Libyan agent, Abu Agila Mas’ud, described as a technician. Mas’ud remains a mysterious individual who was clearly a JSO agent. He was never allowed to be interviewed by the defence. Requests were made to meet and interview him but he had been spirited back to Libya and kept out of sight. When in 1999 investigators had gone to Libya to question government ministers, the officials refused to confirm or deny that Mas’ud existed.

There was good reason for the early suspicions of the investigators that point to Mas’ud as the man who primed the bomb that was placed on board Pan Am flight 103. Research shows him as being implicated in the La Belle bombing in Berlin. He had gone to the city and stayed in a nearby hotel. He had travelled on the same passport later used by him to go to Malta with Megrahi a few years later when the Lockerbie bomb was placed. A Libyan convicted of the bombing, Musbah Eter, told US investigators that Mas’ud and Megrahi were involved in Lockerbie, and that he heard Mas’ud speak of travelling to Malta to prepare the attack.

As the Gadaffi regime fell, information on Mas’ud surfaced through diligent research by an American film-maker and investigations by Human Rights Watch. They located him languishing in a Libyan prison cell and awaiting trial for bomb making. Not, though, for a trial about the devastation wrecked on Pan Am 103 or the town of Lockerbie, but for using remote-detonated explosive devices to booby-trap the cars of Libyan opposition members in 2011, after revolution broke out. He has since been sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment and is incarcerated in the cells once inhabited by Gadaffi’s and his henchmen’s victims.

So the bomb was prepared and primed, but it still needed to be placed on board the Air Malta flight. Megrahi arrived at the time of the loading of the Air Malta flight to Frankfurt. His flight to Tripoli saw check-in open at 8.50am and close at 9.50am. The Air Malta fight to Frankfurt opened at 8.15am and closed at 9.15am. Megrahi was checked in early by a lady at an Air Malta desk dealing with flights to Cairo. It was an adjacent desk to the LAA ones. That check-in had opened at 8.35am and was due to close at 9.35am. Megrahi was checked on to the LAA flight sixth. According to the airline clerk, that would have been early on. That assistance at different airline counters was normal and was simply done to ease congestion. However, in particular, it was for passengers travelling without luggage. Megrahi was going back without any suitcase, which was why she checked him in. That, also, was never clarified by him. Not only was the purpose of his trip never answered but why he landed with a bag and travelled back without one remained unexplained. But he had first visited the LAA offices. There he met Fhimah and the suitcase was handed over. The case Megrahi had brought with him was not going back with him, but was being placed on board the Air Malta flight bound for Frankfurt, primed with the bomb that would detonate aboard the JFK flight from Heathrow. Megrahi’s work was done; it was now for others to take over.

How was the bomb placed aboard? The case Megrahi brought with him would be tagged and placed for loading but not on the flight he was going on. Luggage labels for Air Malta were available. Fhimah had made a note to obtain them. His diary, that had been referred to in court, had noted on the page for December 15 to “take tags from Air Malta”. It had also been subsequently marked “OK” but in a different colour. It had also narrated: “Take/collect tags from the airport (Abdulbaset/Abdussalam).” “Tags” had been written in English and the rest in Arabic. The court accepted that but felt unable to draw the inference that it was to allow for an interlined bag to be placed on board; and accordingly that there was sufficient evidence for a conviction of Fhimah. However, they were certainly highly suspicious actions and led to the conclusion that Megrahi took the case to the airport, but it was Fhimah who would get it airside and beyond security. After all, he had flown out to Libya to accompany Megrahi back with the case and had made notes to prepare for that, including obtaining Air Malta tags. He had security passes, but more importantly a detailed knowledge of the airport and its layout which Megrahi did not have. It was labelled for Air Malta, to be routed on to Pan Am through Frankfurt and Heathrow and to New York with the tags Fhimah’s diary had referred to. The bag was placed in the system going airside without going through the formal check-in desks. It will probably never be known just how the security measures were breached, but no doubt that was why the plot involved those with accreditation, access and knowledge of the airport. If anyone would know how to do it, then Fhimah would.

The bag that Megrahi had brought in was placed on to the Air Malta flight to be transferred at Frankfurt for the fateful rendezvous in Heathrow. The records show that an unaccompanied bag was unloaded at Frankfurt from the Air Malta flight, yet the records from Luqa do not disclose that piece of unaccompanied luggage being loaded. There is no suggestion, though, that the Frankfurt airport authorities are mistaken. It was accepted by both the FAI and the court at Camp Zeist that it had been on that flight from Malta. It was thereafter routed with other unaccompanied baggage to be placed in a container; and thus on board Pan Am 103. As it was an interlined bag, it was subject only to X-ray rather than a physical check; nor would there be an administrative match to a passenger before being loaded and going straight through airport procedures. It, thereafter, went through the system all the way to Heathrow and onto the JFK-bound flight. At Heathrow the Frankfurt bags were placed on a container that was the seat of the bomb. That container, AVE 4041, had the interlined bags, including the Samsonite suitcase and others from Frankfurt. The links were clearly there. Pan Am 103 was doomed, and the bomb that would be detonated over Lockerbie had been primed and placed aboard in Malta.

There are aspects of the bombing that remain a mystery to this day. Given the nature of those involved and the passage of time, that’s understandable. Moreover, given the death of many and the lying low of others, it’s probable it will remain that way for ever. There are also aspects of the case that could not be sustained in a court of law with the high standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt required and specific rules on evidence needed. There are equally aspects of the case that may not have seen a criminal conviction sustained on appeal. But this account of how the bombing was carried out and by whom is based on information gathered meticulously by police and prosecutors from the US, Scotland and elsewhere. It’s also founded on intelligence and sources not available for a court or that have only come to light thereafter. Finally, it’s also predicated on the words of the leader of Libya himself, Muammar Gadaffi, and those who replaced him when the regime fell.

The suggestions of conspiracies by others known or unknown are fanciful. The protestations of innocence by Megrahi are equally so, though his role was a very limited one. He was but a cog in a very much larger wheel, acting under orders from those far more senior than him. The triumvirate of Gadaffi, Senussi and Koussa were all involved, as would have been others in senior positions in the Libyan regime. This, after all, went right to the heart of the state, not simply to a JSO agent carrying a suitcase with a bomb.

Libya did it, Megrahi was part of it and other states and terrorist organisations also played their part. It was in revenge for the downing of the Iran Air flight by a US naval ship. It was, therefore, a coalition of the willing that brought down Pan Am 103.

Thanking their lucky stars
The Lockerbie bombing almost claimed the lives of several celebrities who had been among those scheduled to fly on Pan Am flight 103. Punk star Johnny Rotten had booked but missed the flight.

The Four Tops had been on a European tour and were heading back to the US for Christmas — but a delayed recording session and oversleeping meant they never even made it to the airport. For once, their hectic schedules worked in their favour.

Furthermore,the Swedish tennis star and former world No 1 Mats Wilander and the American Sex and the City star Kim Cattrall had made earlier reservations but did not proceed further.

James Comey iTold a DOJ **** that After ALL I've Been Through iDeserve MORE Than Just a Few NISSAN Execs & a Corrupt DA Indicted. The Lockerbie Families Deserve the TRUTH, America Deserves the TRUTH & I WANT JUSTICE!!!!!

The clothing was not the only evidence against Megrahi, who was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Dr. Swire has strong feelings against the US, as a pacifist who opposed the US retaliatory bombing aginst Gadhafi in 1986. He believes, as many do, that Gadhafi ordered the bombing of Pan Am 103 in 1988 in response to the earlier bombing by the US. Dr.Swire's daughter, Flora, was killed on that plane while traveling to New York to spend Christmas with her American boy friend, which intensified his animus against the US and support for the Libyans. Prior to the trial, Swire and a lawyer representing the Libyan government, Prof. Robert Black, went to Libya to discuss trial strategy and possibe defenses with Col. Gadhafi, and took the position that there was not enough evidence for a conviction. They both publicly stated their personal views that the Libyans were innocent and would not be found guilty. They have continued this fable for 27 years.
Frank Duggan, President
Victims of Pan Am 103, Inc.
Like · Reply · 18 May 2016 14:09

react-text: 93 /react-text New Media Journalist react-text: 95 at /react-text Voice of a Moderate react-text: 97 /react-text

My Uncle is Bill Frisbie who was the Chief Pilof for Pan Am when Pan Am 103 happened. Later I was asked to travel to the Middle East. I met the Palistinian money launderer that processed the Iranian money. I've offered to meet with Frank Duggan and he's never accepted my offer. I've gotten a nasty email from Buck Revell telling me to shut up. I've had numerous current & former CIA tell me that YES Iran ordered the bombing & that it's declassified in a DIA document. I've heard from former FBI. The reason why people communicate to me is they see the bullying that's been done to me for simply telling the truth. I'm embarassed that an American (Frank Duggan) would bully any victim of the Lockerbie bombing no matter what country they come from. It's time for RESPECT for the families of the victims. Frank Duggan has my contact information I know it's not easy saying you were wrong BUT it's time that Frank & others "fessed up"... too many lives have been destroyed becausse ppl like me believe that treating peole with dignity is due.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

James Clapper the NISSAN CEO Carlos Ghosn Got to His Position By Having a Daddy Linked to Abusive Acts in Chile, Argentina & Brazil.... His Aly is Michel Temer.... People From South America See the Ousting of Dilma Rousseff as a Diplomatic Step BACKWARD.

The CEO of NISSAN & other  corporations aligned with Michel Temer are allied with a clique that terrorized ALL of South America for over a decade.  Today they are part of the clique ousting Dilma Rousseff & trying to take away the digital rights of the people of Brazil. 
iFear that if people in South America don't have privacy rights they could be put on DEATH FLIGHTS.  That's what Kissinger's people did to political activist in the 70's. They learned the technique from the French (I think it was Algeria?).  So digital rights are important for a democratic society.  Good people told me last night at CSIS that the wound the Dirty War left was in the process of healing BUT by Brazil bringing in Michel Temer to lead during the Olympics and having people like Carlos Ghosn whose a KNOWN CIA ally who profited from the Dirty War will rip the healing scab and NEW wounds that could be harmful to society could emerge.  It's just sad.  Dilma Rousseff is NOT perfect but she's a hell of a lot less corrupt than the countries alternatives right now.  She never should have help her former boss.

I explained to an IC analyst the issues is NOT about Dilma Rousseff it's about something BIGGER the people from South America the last 4 years have started to heal from the Dirty War & NOW the people & their allies and corporations that profited GLOBALLY from the dirty war are gonna be seen on international TV hosting the Olympics.  To many from Chile & Argentina that suffered severe atrocities it's simply beyond disgusting. 


Notice I've been blogging about this for a LONG time

Sunday, May 1, 2016

James Clapper America Needs to STOP The Global Clique That Have Members in the OIL Industry That are Linked to Those That FUNDED ISIS: The CIA/MIC/OIL Clique is BIG & They're Bullying President Rousseff of Brazil. This Needs to STOP!!!! The Guy That MIGHT Become President & Represent Brazil During Olympics Is Part of a Corruption Scandal Involving Businesses That are in Bed with Putin & America's Enemies.

I've got MANY people that have confirmed the "coup" is linked to the ppl Kissinger (Hillary Clinton's big supporter) helped put in place during the DIRTY WAR.....  Did I tell ya'll all Condor pilots came to my childhood home to "decompress" after flights.  I thank god Obama has declassified my Pre-Teen years... Now I'm waiting for my conception:):) 

A Boeing exec told me that Carlos Ghosn's Brazilian dad was a BIG player in the dirty war & Carlos Ghosn used his CIA connections to "get ahead" & it's why I was bullied.  Evidently I'm known for being "ethical" & I scare ppl that have profited from acts of inhumanity.   What happened in Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Guyana, El Salvador & other places was PURE TERROR.  I have good news & that's children of Nazi's have reached out to me and they want to help me expose the EVIL & help restore humanity to South America.  People connected to the Argentinian Pope have reached out to me and said "Sharyn the War for a Righteous Society is not's NOW intensified".... The good can prevail & it starts by STOPPING Michel Temer's power grab.  I have MANY examples of how he and his party are linked to the the Global Network that has bullied people into helping members of "the clique" profit. It's time for FAIRNESS in the world .. Please help me help those that have reached out ....  Make Brazil an example.  Don't let the corrupt MSM in Brazil aid remnants of one of American's BIGGEST mistakes.... the Dirty War. 

Corruption accusation From WIKI :  As part of the corruption investigations of Operation Car Wash Temer is under investigation for allegedly receiving more than US$1.5 million from a company that received construction contracts from Petrobras; Temer denies wrongdoing, characterizing the payments as legal campaign donations.[6]
NITEROI, Brazil -- Demonstrators protesting the impeachment process threatening Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff occupied dozens of highways in major cities during rush hour Thursday morning, causing long backups. Organizers claimed that 30 highways in nine Brazilian states were blocked. Brazil's anti-impeachment protesters block highways at rush hour 
For months, the business community has been hoping that Temer would take over from the leftist Rousseff. ....And amid months of political maneuvering on all sides, one incident involving Temer stands out as bizarre: a 13-minute audio of him rehearsing an inauguration speech days before the impeachment vote. Temer said it was "accidentally leaked," though detractors say more likely it was done to gauge public sentiment.......Only 2 percent of Brazilians said they'd vote for him for president in 2018

Everything began with the mensalão trial [the trial of certain PT politicians charged with making secret payments to federal deputies in return for votes] when the Supreme Court used the principle of domínio do fato, never used before or after in Brazil and rarely used in other countries, to convict Zé Dirceu [a former PT president and coordinator of Lula’s presidential campaign in 2002]. Under this principle, a court can determine that, even if there is no proof of the accused’s involvement, it was impossible for him or her not to have known. The arbitrary powers used today are different: providing selective leaks to the press of unproven accusations or even mere suppositions and suspicions; preventing lawyers from seeing the charges; and holding suspects in prison for long periods before their trials (some for over three months) in clear violation of the legal conditions for refusing bail.
Leading businessmen have been held and subjected to pressure to force them to collaborate with the authorities in return for shorter sentences, which is why there have been such remarkable revelations. The scandal in itself is huge and will continue to grow. Powerful players are involved – the large engineering companies, seven political parties (but mainly the Partido Popular, PMDB and the PT), and about 50 former and current members of Congress. And the other large state companies may also be involved, along with those involved in the building of big infrastructure projects, such as hydroelectric dams in the Amazon, as has already been leaked to the press.

Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff is facing an impeachment - some even say a coup - which, if carried through, may bring her vice-president, Michel Temer, to the helm. And what's so special about Temer, aside from his unpopularity, shady background, and connection to the Brazilian oligarchs? Well, he happens to hail from Lebanese origins. Ditto for Columbia's Shakira and Julio César Turbay, president from 1978 to 1982, Mexico's .... Carlos Slim Helú, Argentina's Yamila Diaz, the French-Lebanese-Brazilian Carlos Ghosn, ones who run the coup are not the military, but an integrated community composed by the media, the judiciary, and cemented together by an assembly of bandits.
Brazilian democracy is under threat of a coup.

The impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff, according to the international press, was approved by "an assembly of bandits, the Chamber of Deputies, led by a bandit named Eduardo Cunha making the case for the removal of a President without any legal or constitutional basis."

Later, in April 2016, an audio file of Temer was leaked to Brazilian media. In the file, Temer speaks as if the impeachment process had already been confirmed and he was the new president.[8] “I don’t want to generate false expectations,” Temer said on the recordings, which were first published by Folha de S. Paulo on Monday afternoon. “Let’s not think that a possible change in government will solve everything in three or four months.”The leak came just hours before a special lower house committee was scheduled to vote whether to back the request to impeach the president, 

10. Temer may be accused of being a “conspirator” and “coup organizer.”In trying to defend herself against impeachment, Dilma has attacked both Cunha and Temer. She has already accused the vice president of being a conspirator and of organizing a coup. The leaked WhatsApp “victory audio“ only reinforces the PT’s position that Temer is working behind the scenes to remove Dilma from office. To associate the image of a “traitor” with the vice president is not a difficult task for PT’s propaganda machinery. Thus, disapproval of Temer is likely to grow.

Corruption accusation[edit]

As part of the corruption investigations of Operation Car Wash Temer is under investigation for allegedly receiving more than US$1.5 million from a company that received construction contracts from Petrobras; Temer denies wrongdoing, characterizing the payments as legal campaign donations.[6]

Friday, April 29, 2016

My Nissan Whistleblower Blog is Gonna Get POPULAR Again😏

Nissan bullies ppl to succeed in business & I just learned allies of Carlos Ghosn bullying the President of Brazil🇧🇷

Saturday, April 16, 2016

Carlos Ghosn PUT on Your Seat Belt

Righteously Rogue

The definition of righteous:    
1. Morally upright; without guilt or sin: 
a righteous parishioner.
2. In accordance with virtue or morality: 
a righteous judgment.
3. Morally justifiable: 

righteous anger.